As a math department chairman, I am often referred to as a “tested area” chairman.  I am no longer a math chairman or an academic course chairman.  This label says a lot about my role as a chairman and a teacher.  I am responsible for collecting, analyzing, and monitoring data.  I attend numerous meetings about testing and data.  I often wonder if it would be better to be responsible for a non-tested course.

Are there any advantages to being a teacher of a tested course?  This is a difficult question.  It is easy to list the disadvantages such as the pressure of obtaining high pass rates, the lack of control in creating the assessment, the overall stress to perform, etc.

On the flip side, there really are some advantages.  Testing does set standards and expectations across the board.  We might not agree with those expectations, but at the very least there is no question about what should be taught. Looking beyond the amount of work and time required, the collection of data can also be viewed as an advantage. Data can provide a teacher with a lot of information about his or her teaching and about his or her students. Data can be a great tool for determining what should be retaught and reviewed.

The bottom line is that testing is not going away. To be successful, we need to continue on the path of good teaching and find the positive side of assessment.

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “

  1. What a great point. Many who are against testing don’t have a valid replacement. I’d much rather they stand for something rather than against everything. There has to be a way to make sure the babies are getting the content.

  2. On your first point – as a teacher of a non-tested subject I often resent the emphasis put on the “core curriculum” classes. Even the term assumes that my class, an “elective,” just isn’t important. Counselors will pull kids out of my class instead of a core subject, so as not to lose time in such an “important” class. Were told to limit disruptions to “core” classes as much as possible. Core teachers are sent to numerous in-services to help them improve their instruction and methods, while the budgets for elective area teacher training is cut.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s